Considering the difficulties in accessing key sources of information, especially children (under 18 years of age) and their parents/caregivers/families from whom information/data can be obtained, as well as time and resource constraints, face-toface interviews with 200 adults and approximately 10 representatives of institutions/organisations were envisaged. Prior to the fieldwork, a face-to-face workshop on gender and children's rights with a small number of girls over the age of 10 was added to this planning. Since collecting data directly from children on the subject carries a high degree of child protection and child safety risk, a closed workshop was held in a safe environment for children's observation, experience and knowledge transfer, led by a facilitator who is an expert and experienced in child participation and child rights. However, according to Article 6 of the Child Protection Law No. 5395, ‘Judicial and administrative authorities, law enforcement officers, health and education institutions, non-governmental organisations are obliged to report children in need of protection to the Social Services and Child Protection Agency.’ Flying Broom Association's Child Safety Policy Document and Code of Conduct, Child and Adult Consent Forms were specificized for the research, taking into For this reason, the Action Plan Note in Case of Risk Detection, which was prepared by Flying Broom Association by making use of UNFPA's Legal Information Guide for the Prevention of Child, Early and Forced Marriages, Development Workshop Cooperative's Indentification and Referral Guide for the Prevention of Child Marriages in Seasonal Migratory Agricultural Worker Families, and Nirengi Association's Abuse-Violence-Child Marriage Information Note was shared with those who would take part in the field research. In addition, a meeting with a special agenda was held to discuss the risks and steps to be taken in possible scenarios in case of a possible case or risk account the research needs and the project purpose. In addition, ethical procedures were determined for the declaration (especially those who answered during the survey that their own child is married or will be married soon) in workshop with children. Data collection was based on the declarations of the respondents. Therefore, the risk or existence of child terms of the safety/security of the participant (and his/her child), the interviewer, KÖVED and Flying Broom Association and the work of cluster marriage was accepted as data to the extent they declared. A child protection case management process that would member CSOs. The meeting, where the representatives of the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) and require the intervention of third parties or public administration was not carried out by the Flying Broom Association or other civil society organisations in the cluster or the people employed in the project. 20 Sened Association shared their knowledge and experience on field observations, institutional policies and workflows, also contributed to the action plan of the field research.